Year of Open Source

One year of trying to use only free software, libre hardware, and option source options for all aspects of life.



[UPDATE] The IndieGoGo campaign has come to an end, and thanks to generosity of 134 lovely people, we raised $6,731!

That’s enough for me to be able to focus on this project for the year, pay for plenty of materials required, and I don’t have to spend as much time working on other jobs. I’ll send out the Copyleft Cookies recipe and an update email in the next couple of days, and the other perks will follow in the next couple of weeks. Thank you so much to all who helped out,  and if you like you can see who all these wonderful supporters were.

What is the Year of Open Source?

From August 2012, I’m trying to live Open Source for a year – avoiding traditionally copyrighted products, using products released under open licenses, or adapting or developing my own.

I plan to use myself as a subject in an experiment to canvas the range of open source ideas and products, search out and discuss ways around traditional licensing, and see how the ideas of free software, libre hardware and openness can affect different areas of everyday life.
In every aspect of my life, from the clothes I wear to the film equipment and appliances I use, I will be looking for and switching to open source alternatives, in hardware, software and services, documenting everything in order to show as many people as possible the many directions and applications of this way of thinking.

If you missed the crowdfunding campaign but would still like to contribute, please consider a small donation through Flattr


38 thoughts on “THANK YOU!

  1. Hi, and good luck on what sounds like a great and interesting project.
    I look forward to seeing what comes out of it, especially since you seem to have the humour necessary to survive through it.

    One thing though, you may want to dive into the difference (and lack of difference) between Open Source and Free Software very early on, and explain how the ideas and values of the world you are about to be 100 % part of are those of the Free Software movement initially. Open Source, as I’m sure you know, is a term coined in the 90s to make “Free” Software more palatable to business communities. Now of course, it is more visual to talk about Open Source Jeans rather than Free Jeans, which would just be confusing, but I strongly suggest you talk more about Freedom (what it is ultimately about) and less about Openness (which is a way of getting there) in your next videos 🙂

    Cheers and best of luck!

    • Yes, absolutely! that’s my thoughts exactly. I realise there is quite a spectrum between the FSF and the OSI, and I do hope to make that clear to people, but again, outside of software the words do have different connotations.

  2. Now, there are a few things you should make open-source too:

    – Open-source (libre) video provider: not everyone is able to play Flash (proprietary) or H.264 (the HTML5 codec used by Vimeo). YouTube offers WebM as a format, but is still using nonfree code to display it. You could use an instance of MediaGoblin for hosting your videos, images and audio, which you can host in your own server.
    – Open-source (libre) microblogging: Twitter’s proprietary, consider instead. Again, you can also host your own version of in your own server.
    – Open-source (libre) social networking: Facebook’s proprietary, consider Friendica or Diaspora instead. Both can be self-hosted.
    And so on:
    – Chat: Replace Google Talk / Live Messenger with Jabber. There are several free-as-in-freedom providers out there, and you can host it yourself.
    – E-mail: It seems you’re already on the track to switch to an o.s./libre alternative, good job! Hopefully you can switch to self-hosting plus a free-as-in-freedom web interface, like Roundcube or Squirrelmail.
    – Blog: Same thing – it’s good to see you use a self-hosted WordPress!
    – Operative system: Most Linux distros include nonfree components. If you really want to live a full year freely, switch to Trisquel or Parabola GNU+Linux-libre. (Don’t forget the GNU, it’s actually more important than Linux!) If some hardware component stops working because it requires nonfree drivers, take a look at ThinkPenguin to search for replacements.
    – Browser: Same as above, Firefox and Chrome include nonfree components. After you switch to Trisquel or Parabola, install Iceweasel-libre with LibreJS (that will prevent your browser to run nonfree JavaScript found in Internet sites).
    – File hosting: OwnCloud and SyncAny replace Dropbox. Both are self-hosted.
    – Search provider: Instead of Google or Bing, try Seeks and YaCy. Both have different ways to obtain results, Seeks being better than YaCy but more reliant in third-party sites. Both can be self-hosted.
    – Translation: Apertium is the best replacement I’ve found. Not too good, but does the job.
    – Document formats: If you intend to use patent-free formats, try LibreOffice and its OpenDocument format. Also, you can export to PDFs which are free-as-in-freedom and can be displayed by almost anyone.
    – Music, video, etc.: Time to add a side-dish of free cultural works. The works with Creative Commons licenses may or may not be free-as-in-freedom, there being six licenses. The only two free ones are CC-Attribution-ShareAlike (CC-BY-SA) and CC-Attribution (CC-BY). You can download them in OGG format from Internet Archive and Libre.FM (a Last.FM audioscrobbling replacement), and MP3 at Jamendo.

    • Hi Carlos, thanks for your comment, some great points!
      I use Diaspora personally, and is a good idea, I’ll set up an account. At this pre-production stage the focus is on getting the word out there so that also means using facebook and twitter. But I haven’t decided if that will continue after the project starts. Certainly my own personal facebook will go, but as for the Year of Open Source facebook page, it’s still a little unclear. This is basically because one key aspect of the project is getting more people involved in free and open source software, to spread the idea to a wider audience, and in order to maintain a conversation with people who are not yet involved in the FOSS scene, I would imagine the facebook page will be important to keep. But as I said, it’s not decided either way yet, and it’s something I would welcome further input on.

      • You can control Facebook and Twitter from Friendica! In that way you get the best of both worlds: privacy and freedom by Friendica, wide-spread communication from FB/Twitter.

      • Also: Don’t forget to check free cultural works:
        – News: Wikinews (CC-BY), and Global Voices (CC-BY too).
        – Music: Just a few artists use free-as-in-freedom licenses regularly. Josh Woodward, Les Juanitos, Orphan Songs, Lorenzo’s Music, Neurotech, Incompetech are the ones I remember right now.
        – Videos: Now we’re getting harder! The Blender projects (3D shorts) are a start. There’s also Valkaama (a movie) and Sita Sings the Blues (another movie, this one is animated). The NASA’s videos are usually public domain, too.
        Also, you can search by license in several sites (like YouTube, Jamendo or Vimeo), download the files and convert them to open formats, then host them somewhere. Just be careful that the artist didn’t accidentally tag the file with a free license (especially if other files are with an nonfree license).

  3. Open source still has copyright, the license is what counts.

    • quite right, I should have said “avoiding traditionally copyrighted products” rather than “avoiding copyrighted products”. I feel my explanation of copyright vs. copyleft still stands though? or do you see it otherwise?

      • This site would actually need a new URL to fit the FSF definitions:
        – Open-source > Free > Libre
        – Copyrighted > Proprietary > Privative
        – Linux > GNU/Linux > GNU-OS

  4. Having had many discussions with people on the matter, I think my policy for the project will be using the phrase ‘Free and Open Source Software’. I’m considering referring to the hardware side of the project as Libre hardware. I’ll keep the URL and name ‘Year of Open Source’, however.

  5. Dummy question: you left Mac for Linux. But what about your hardware? Dominated by Intel or AMD. Those are copyrighted? Is there a Open Source hardware?

    • Not a silly question at all, an extremely important issue. There are many different Open source microcontrollers, single-board computers etc, and plenty of different individual components which have been open sourced or developed as libre hardware. However, there is clearly no direct open source alternative to a MacBook Pro. I don’t know of any fully libre systems with the capability to edit HD video and do all of the tasks I need to achieve on a personal computer, but I would like input from other people to find out just how far I can get.
      The extent of my experimentation in this regard is also limited by how much I am able to raise through the crowdfunding campaign – if I reach my target then I am likely to be able to source parts and components and work with experienced and technically-skilled people to try to get as open / libre a system as possible.

  6. I really liked the video. It was funny and very well made. I commend you for deciding to use both “Free” and “Open Source” terms. As you have probably discovered, they mean almost exactly the same thing in practice though they originate from quite different philosophical backgrounds. Hopefully you will be able to explore the origins of these movements and compare and contrast them.

    I’d also like to point out that while your description of Copyleft was good, not all Free and Open Source software is Copyleft. There is plenty of great Free and Open Source software under “permissive” licenses such as the Apache web server you mentioned.

    You may also want to find some better terms for other aspects of the project. For example, “Open Source” doesn’t really mean anything for clothing. I’m guessing that maybe you want clothing for which you can obtain the design? Maybe a new term needs to be coined.

    • Thanks Jonathan – yes, you’re right, the terminology of this entire movement and philosophy is certainly a big issue.
      I think I will have to use a very clear labeling system to indicate in an understandable way whether something is copyleft, permissive, public domain, traditionally copyrighted, or something that falls inbetween these.
      As for clothing and other areas, I’m looking for projects and products where the intention is for the process to be transparent, and self-manufacturing or modification is allowed, facilitated or encouraged. I’m wondering if I should generally use the word ‘libre’ more when talking about all these different areas.

  7. This will be very interesting to follow… but you know, it’s kind of already been done:

    Also good to remember that a lot of going open source can be achieved by learning to go without many unnecessary “necessities”.

    • Hi Basil, I don’t quite see how living the beachcomber lifestyle is the same as examining the licensing issues and development techniques of open source? This project is not just about living with less, but rather it is about the creative and collaborative development of products, and the effects of this philosophy on economic, industrial, education, and political systems.

  8. I’ll definitely follow this. I think it is perfectly understandable and necessary that you keep using Tweeter and Facebook to spread the word. Your efforts are commendable and it might be a big shock in the beginning. And if you come across some purists don’t let them make you feel bad. As I saw above, you realize there’s no such thing as 100% open source, so stick to your philosophy and just go as far as you possibly can, not trying to go as far as others think you should. Good luck bro.

    • Thanks Abner – it’s great to see many people really ‘getting’ the spirit of this project. Some people do seem to take it the wrong way, but I think as my project progresses, it should become clearer to them what I am doing and why. Thanks for the support!

  9. You really should be accepting bitcoin rather than Paypal for donation if you want to make a movie about open source.

    • I want to do an article & video about BitCoin, and I will have a donate button for Bitcoin during the year – I’m not going to be using IndieGoGo after this campaign has finished. Re: the laptop, have a read of my FAQ. If anyone feels like donating a Lemote, I’m all for it.

  10. Just make a twitter account and a decent blog – you can write, can’t you?

  11. I can write, and will write, don’t you worry about that! But I can get my message across more creatively, and to more people, by using a variety of media – whether that’s video, animation, photography or audio.

  12. Perhaps you should look into accepting (and spending) bitcoins ( / ) Currency (systems) as we know them have been proprietary too. I’ll be the first to donate to your project if you accept bitcoins! Good luck!

  13. “Open Source” housing = Hexayurt

  14. It’s a laudable objective to avoid non-open products and demonstrate how easy or hard it is to do, but I am not clear on the larger argument you are trying to make with this project. If you are hoping to show that everyone can go open, then having to raise 20k USD in order to do it, will backfire – it makes it seem like it’s actually a really big deal, and could discourage those who can’t raise 20k. Hope you will proceed to do this even without 20k.

    • Hi Philipp – thanks for your interest. I am not hoping to show that everyone can go 100% open source. Even I, as I pointed out in my video and my FAQ, will not be able to go 100%, but the project is about the attempt. The $20K is not so much the costs of living open source as it is production costs to make the videos and organise workshops. I need to pay camera operators, sound recordists, a producer etc. It’s not one particular argument or point that I want to make, but rather I want to investigate the effects of the open source software movement on other aspects of life, and through that encourage other people to get involved.

      • I didn’t think you were planning to go 100% open, but that you want to inspire more people to try to be more open. Getting the word out about the experience is great.

        I imagined the videos to be short reports by yourself, which could be produced in an open source / DIY style. Would higher production value be useful to get the message out more widely? Khan Academy showed that low-tech videos in education (which may be a different case) are more effective than more polished ones. Not sure if that is a lesson that is applicable here, but worth considering.

        Anyway, I’m intrigued and following along.

  15. This page doesn’t seem to have a title tag content in it. When I copy-pasted this site ( to Facebook, the link title said “no title” which is not a good way to promote the page. And it might reduce Google hits as well. Sam, could you add the title somehow? I’m not familiar with the blog environment but I guess it can be done through its settings somewhere.


  16. Interesting concept. I’ve been using largely open-source software for some time now.

    I think open-standards is a bigger target to chase, open-source will come along as a natural consequence. You won’t completely stomp out proprietary software and hardware, but so long as the interfaces between these black boxes is completely open, this won’t matter IMO.

    Someone suggested the Lemote hardware. The old Loongson 2E-based Fulong (desktop) computers and the Mengloong (laptop; I think that’s how it’s spelt) might’ve done sort-of okay for video editing. In fact, I did use one to put together a standard-definition video. They have an ATI Radeon 7000M 16MB PCI graphics chip on-board.

    The catch is OpenGL, for me at least, proved to be a major pain in the arse… I think I managed about 10 seconds of beautiful hardware-accelerated OpenGL under Quake II on these things before the driver shat itself and I had to SSH in to reboot the machine. That said, 2D acceleration worked fine right up to 2048×1576 screen resolution and it was perfectly capable of playing some of the ABC television video podcasts full-screen.

    The modern ones, I think the moden Fulong uses some SIS chip, which has no open-source 3D driver available. The Yeeloong has a SiliconMotion LynxEM chip with about 2MB video memory and a max resolution of 1024×600. It’ll play video just fine, again, I’ve been able to play videos on mine full-screen without issue, but I think HD would be out of the question.

    And of course, none of these machines support FireWire. USB 2.0 is all they offer.

    Some of the modern tablets probably have as much, probably more, computing power these days. The Lemote systems weren’t bad in their time, compared to the SGI machines I had used previously, they were a breath of fresh air, but there are other options now for a computer minus the Microsoft/Apple tax.

  17. Great initiative! Best of luck for the coming year 🙂

    As you’re in Berlin, you may want to visit the Berlin Open Source Meetup in August (

    An other idea for a laptop; you could look into getting sponsored by the OLPC project. Their laptops are pretty much as Open Source as it can get:

  18. Talking about cameras, there’s a rather nice-looking copyleft camera, the Elphel:

  19. Please be sure to skip any copyrighted medicines when you get sick. Then you’ll get a proper perspective on “open source”.

    Without compensating creators by allowing them to profit from the sales of their ideas, innovation will slow down.

    Of course anyone who hasn’t had an original thought will think patents and copyrights are “limiting”!

    • Hi, thanks for your input – actually there are other options than drugs which are patented:
      This project is not pure propaganda – yes, I’m very optimistic about the idea but the purpose of my research is also about working out where the limits of open source thinking and free culture lie. I don’t think that creators should go without compensation and recognition, but I think it’s important to realise that any creative work is built on the work of others. Any original thought is inspired and developed through experiences and interactions and suggestions from other people along the way. There are new business models emerging, different ways to share ideas and creative output, foster innovation, and make money along the way.

      “Without compensating creators by allowing them to profit from the sales of their ideas, innovation will slow down.”
      Please watch this video to see some of this incredible deceleration:

      “Of course anyone who hasn’t had an original thought will think patents and copyrights are “limiting”!”
      On the contrary, there are plenty of people who haven’t had an original thought who think traditional copyright is very important indeed:
      The depth of acrimony in the break between Nickelback and Ryan Vikedal became apparent when Nickelback lead vocalist and songwriter Chad Kroeger asked that Vikedal and his production company Ladekiv Music, Inc. sign over all financial interest in future royalties for the songs created by the group when Vikedal was drummer and return any public peformance royalties earned since January 2005. Kroeger based his claim on being the sole author and “maker” of the songs, and he demanded that he and his company be assigned all copyright for the 3 albums recorded while Vikedal was a member of the group.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s